American Athletic · 2026
Tulsa
4–4
CFPi+ rank#89of 138 FBS teams
-5.5CFPi+ rating
#84Best: National composite
#117Weakest: Head coach
4Games left
Where the team ranks
CFPi+#89-5.5
Offense#86+23.1
Defense#87+28.6
How efficiently it plays
EPi+#87-5.4
Off EPi+#95-4.2
Def EPi+#81+1.1
Offense and defense
| Stat | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | #10639.9% | #6940.9% |
| Explosiveness | #48+1.277 | #53+1.207 |
| Havoc rate | #7714.9% | #12912.0% |
| Pass PPA | #78+0.206 | #73+0.180 |
| Rush PPA | #22+0.207 | #78+0.076 |
Raw season splits, not opponent-adjusted. Defense #1 is the stingiest in the country.
The roster and the staff
TPi+#84-4.5
Recruiting#86-3.7
Returning#71+0.8
247 talent#84622.8
Head coach#117-12.4
What other systems say
Composite#84-3.2
SP+#82-2.2
SP+ off#68+26.8
SP+ def#94+28.9
ESPN FPI#83-3.7
The box-score view
Yards/G#85369.8
Yards/G allowed#116405.4
Pass yards/G#88211.6
Rush yards/G#65158.1
3rd down#11933.3%
3rd down allowed#9540.5%
Sacks/G#552.3
Takeaways/G#111.9
Ranks are national out of 138 FBS teams and #1 is best. The bar shows where a rank sits in the field; the rating is the source beneath it.
Every game, with the model's read
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Projected | Win prob | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Oklahoma State | W 24–10 | Final | |||
| 2 | @ Sam Houston | W 23–17 | Final | |||
| 3 | vs East Texas A&M | W 42–0 | Final | |||
| 4 | @ Arkansas | L 6–34 | Final | |||
| 5 | vs North Texas | L 44–45 | Final | |||
| 6 | @ Navy | L 26–34 | Final | |||
| 7 | @ Rice | W 38–17 | Final | |||
| 8 | vs Army | L 35–38 | Final | |||
| 10 | @ Tulane | — | ||||
| 11 | vs Florida Atlantic | — | ||||
| 12 | vs Charlotte | — | ||||
| 13 | @ UTSA | — | ||||
Unlock Tulsa’s remaining schedule
CFPi-X V4.0 Selected · data vintage 10/26/2026