SEC · 2026
Texas A&M
4–4
CFPi+ rank#23of 138 FBS teams
+13.4CFPi+ rating
#7Best: TPi+ talent
#66Weakest: EPi+ efficiency
4Games left
Where the team ranks
CFPi+#23+13.4
Offense#43+30.4
Defense#14+17.0
How efficiently it plays
EPi+#66+0.2
Off EPi+#86-3.4
Def EPi+#43-3.6
Offense and defense
| Stat | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | #7042.5% | #4639.4% |
| Explosiveness | #121+1.139 | #105+1.307 |
| Havoc rate | #5914.0% | #8715.0% |
| Pass PPA | #110+0.093 | #100+0.268 |
| Rush PPA | #57+0.131 | #26-0.056 |
Raw season splits, not opponent-adjusted. Defense #1 is the stingiest in the country.
The roster and the staff
TPi+#7+23.9
Recruiting#7+23.2
Returning#33+11.4
247 talent#7933.0
Head coach#10+17.3
What other systems say
Composite#35+10.3
SP+#34+9.7
SP+ off#44+30.1
SP+ def#33+20.8
ESPN FPI#22+13.4
The box-score view
Yards/G#105347.0
Yards/G allowed#30315.6
Pass yards/G#109191.4
Rush yards/G#69155.6
3rd down#5542.1%
3rd down allowed#2131.3%
Sacks/G#1330.9
Takeaways/G#491.4
Ranks are national out of 138 FBS teams and #1 is best. The bar shows where a rank sits in the field; the rating is the source beneath it.
Every game, with the model's read
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Projected | Win prob | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Missouri State | W 50–0 | Final | |||
| 2 | vs Arizona State | W 48–20 | Final | |||
| 3 | vs #13Kentucky | L 21–31 | Final | |||
| 4 | @ #4LSU | L 6–35 | Final | |||
| 5 | vs Arkansas | W 34–7 | Final | |||
| 6 | @ #25Missouri | L 6–27 | Final | |||
| 7 | vs The Citadel | W 41–0 | Final | |||
| 8 | @ #1Alabama | L 20–31 | Final | |||
| 10 | @ #14South Carolina | — | ||||
| 11 | vs #10Tennessee | — | ||||
| 12 | @ #22Oklahoma | — | ||||
| 13 | vs #7Texas | — | ||||
Unlock Texas A&M’s remaining schedule
CFPi-X V4.0 Selected · data vintage 10/26/2026