SEC · 2026
Oklahoma
4–3
CFPi+ rank#22of 138 FBS teams
+13.5CFPi+ rating
#6Best: Defense
#54Weakest: Offense
5Games left
Where the team ranks
CFPi+#22+13.5
Offense#54+27.6
Defense#6+14.1
How efficiently it plays
EPi+#27+11.1
Off EPi+#85-3.2
Def EPi+#8-14.3
Offense and defense
| Stat | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | #12736.9% | #433.5% |
| Explosiveness | #120+1.143 | #51+1.202 |
| Havoc rate | #10516.8% | #2418.4% |
| Pass PPA | #76+0.208 | #9-0.040 |
| Rush PPA | #136-0.186 | #21-0.063 |
Raw season splits, not opponent-adjusted. Defense #1 is the stingiest in the country.
The roster and the staff
TPi+#17+16.4
Recruiting#14+18.7
Returning#15+14.2
247 talent#17851.1
Head coach#38+7.7
What other systems say
Composite#30+11.5
SP+#33+10.3
SP+ off#88+24.3
SP+ def#6+14.2
ESPN FPI#19+14.1
The box-score view
Yards/G#114333.7
Yards/G allowed#11273.7
Pass yards/G#70228.1
Rush yards/G#128105.6
3rd down#10835.4%
3rd down allowed#223.6%
Sacks/G#73.1
Takeaways/G#691.1
Ranks are national out of 138 FBS teams and #1 is best. The bar shows where a rank sits in the field; the rating is the source beneath it.
Every game, with the model's read
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Projected | Win prob | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs UTEP | W 51–0 | Final | |||
| 2 | @ Michigan | L 10–17 | Final | |||
| 3 | vs New Mexico | W 14–6 | Final | |||
| 4 | @ #6Georgia | L 13–41 | Final | |||
| 6 | vs #7Texas | W 27–24 | Final | |||
| 7 | vs #13Kentucky | L 13–21 | Final | |||
| 8 | @ Mississippi State | W 23–15 | Final | |||
| 9 | vs #14South Carolina | — | ||||
| 10 | @ #21Florida | — | ||||
| 11 | vs #9Ole Miss | — | ||||
| 12 | vs #23Texas A&M | — | ||||
| 13 | @ #25Missouri | — | ||||
Unlock Oklahoma’s remaining schedule
CFPi-X V4.0 Selected · data vintage 10/26/2026




#6
#7
#13
#14
#21
#9
#23
#25