American Athletic · 2026
UAB
4–3
CFPi+ rank#111of 138 FBS teams
-12.2CFPi+ rating
#63Best: Head coach
#119Weakest: Offense
5Games left
Where the team ranks
CFPi+#111-12.2
Offense#119+18.4
Defense#103+30.5
How efficiently it plays
EPi+#95-7.2
Off EPi+#125-9.4
Def EPi+#50-2.2
Offense and defense
| Stat | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | #8641.5% | #9643.4% |
| Explosiveness | #100+1.183 | #3+1.039 |
| Havoc rate | #10616.8% | #7415.5% |
| Pass PPA | #130-0.020 | #14-0.010 |
| Rush PPA | #70+0.097 | #80+0.079 |
Raw season splits, not opponent-adjusted. Defense #1 is the stingiest in the country.
The roster and the staff
TPi+#92-6.0
Recruiting#98-5.9
Returning#29+12.0
247 talent#92606.2
Head coach#63+0.0
What other systems say
Composite#103-10.2
SP+#110-10.4
SP+ off#109+20.0
SP+ def#103+30.5
ESPN FPI#119-13.7
The box-score view
Yards/G#110339.0
Yards/G allowed#31316.9
Pass yards/G#126171.0
Rush yards/G#53168.0
3rd down#5641.9%
3rd down allowed#9440.4%
Sacks/G#592.1
Takeaways/G#371.4
Ranks are national out of 138 FBS teams and #1 is best. The bar shows where a rank sits in the field; the rating is the source beneath it.
Every game, with the model's read
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Projected | Win prob | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @ Illinois | L 23–42 | Final | |||
| 2 | vs UL Monroe | W 26–20 | Final | |||
| 3 | @ Louisiana | L 14–21 | Final | |||
| 4 | vs Navy | W 24–20 | Final | |||
| 5 | vs Samford | W 33–14 | Final | |||
| 6 | @ Memphis | L 13–38 | Final | |||
| 7 | vs East Carolina | W 30–17 | Final | |||
| 9 | @ South Florida | — | ||||
| 10 | vs Charlotte | — | ||||
| 11 | @ Temple | — | ||||
| 12 | vs UTSA | — | ||||
| 13 | @ North Texas | — | ||||
Unlock UAB’s remaining schedule
CFPi-X V4.0 Selected · data vintage 10/26/2026