ACC · 2026
Miami
7–0
CFPi+ rank#2of 138 FBS teams
+26.3CFPi+ rating
#1Best: Offense
#12Weakest: TPi+ talent
5Games left
Where the team ranks
CFPi+#2+26.3
Offense#1+41.8
Defense#9+15.5
How efficiently it plays
EPi+#7+21.6
Off EPi+#3+16.7
Def EPi+#35-4.9
Offense and defense
| Stat | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | #253.0% | #3537.9% |
| Explosiveness | #16+1.351 | #110+1.318 |
| Havoc rate | #38.4% | #9314.7% |
| Pass PPA | #1+0.680 | #72+0.179 |
| Rush PPA | #19+0.211 | #3-0.175 |
Raw season splits, not opponent-adjusted. Defense #1 is the stingiest in the country.
The roster and the staff
TPi+#12+19.6
Recruiting#9+20.8
Returning#48+8.8
247 talent#12885.9
Head coach#11+17.0
What other systems say
Composite#4+25.4
SP+#5+24.7
SP+ off#1+40.9
SP+ def#14+16.6
ESPN FPI#3+27.5
The box-score view
Yards/G#1551.9
Yards/G allowed#21299.1
Pass yards/G#3340.7
Rush yards/G#18211.1
3rd down#554.5%
3rd down allowed#3434.0%
Sacks/G#132.9
Takeaways/G#531.3
Ranks are national out of 138 FBS teams and #1 is best. The bar shows where a rank sits in the field; the rating is the source beneath it.
Every game, with the model's read
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Projected | Win prob | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @ Stanford | W 45–6 | Final | |||
| 2 | vs Florida A&M | W 77–7 | Final | |||
| 3 | @ #17Wake Forest | W 33–20 | Final | |||
| 4 | vs Central Michigan | W 52–3 | Final | |||
| 5 | @ Clemson | W 41–13 | Final | |||
| 7 | vs Florida State | W 43–35 | Final | |||
| 8 | vs Pittsburgh | W 52–23 | Final | |||
| 9 | @ North Carolina | — | ||||
| 10 | @ #5Notre Dame | — | ||||
| 11 | vs Duke | — | ||||
| 12 | vs Virginia Tech | — | ||||
| 13 | vs Boston College | — | ||||
Unlock Miami’s remaining schedule
CFPi-X V4.0 Selected · data vintage 10/26/2026



#17




#5

