Big Ten · 2026
Michigan
4–3
CFPi+ rank#37of 138 FBS teams
+8.9CFPi+ rating
#11Best: TPi+ talent
#62Weakest: Offense
5Games left
Where the team ranks
CFPi+#37+8.9
Offense#62+26.3
Defense#15+17.4
How efficiently it plays
EPi+#36+7.8
Off EPi+#90-3.7
Def EPi+#15-11.5
Offense and defense
| Stat | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | #10440.2% | #1334.9% |
| Explosiveness | #114+1.149 | #7+1.084 |
| Havoc rate | #11917.5% | #6416.2% |
| Pass PPA | #109+0.094 | #10-0.037 |
| Rush PPA | #94+0.046 | #9-0.126 |
Raw season splits, not opponent-adjusted. Defense #1 is the stingiest in the country.
The roster and the staff
TPi+#11+20.0
Recruiting#12+20.2
Returning#35+11.0
247 talent#11890.0
Head coach#24+11.9
What other systems say
Composite#41+8.1
SP+#27+11.5
SP+ off#86+24.4
SP+ def#3+12.7
ESPN FPI#34+11.1
The box-score view
Yards/G#130300.6
Yards/G allowed#3250.1
Pass yards/G#127165.9
Rush yards/G#100134.7
3rd down#8638.5%
3rd down allowed#2532.0%
Sacks/G#592.1
Takeaways/G#531.3
Ranks are national out of 138 FBS teams and #1 is best. The bar shows where a rank sits in the field; the rating is the source beneath it.
Every game, with the model's read
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Projected | Win prob | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Western Michigan | W 13–12 | Final | |||
| 2 | vs #22Oklahoma | W 17–10 | Final | |||
| 3 | vs UTEP | W 52–17 | Final | |||
| 4 | vs Iowa | L 19–20 | Final | |||
| 5 | @ Minnesota | L 14–20 | Final | |||
| 7 | vs Penn State | W 21–18 | Final | |||
| 8 | vs #8Indiana | L 6–13 | Final | |||
| 9 | @ Rutgers | — | ||||
| 10 | vs Michigan State | — | ||||
| 11 | @ #11Oregon | — | ||||
| 12 | vs #18UCLA | — | ||||
| 13 | @ #3Ohio State | — | ||||
Unlock Michigan’s remaining schedule
CFPi-X V4.0 Selected · data vintage 10/26/2026


#22



#8

#11
#18
#3