Mid-American · 2026
Sacramento State
1–7
CFPi+ rank#138of 138 FBS teams
-26.5CFPi+ rating
#63Best: Head coach
#138Weakest: EPi+ efficiency
4Games left
Where the team ranks
CFPi+#138-26.5
Offense#138+12.5
Defense#138+39.0
How efficiently it plays
EPi+#138-29.1
Off EPi+#137-17.6
Def EPi+#125+11.4
Offense and defense
| Stat | Offense | Defense |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | #13036.7% | #7541.5% |
| Explosiveness | #138+1.035 | #117+1.341 |
| Havoc rate | #12417.7% | #13510.6% |
| Pass PPA | #129-0.015 | #123+0.382 |
| Rush PPA | #138-0.192 | #96+0.120 |
Raw season splits, not opponent-adjusted. Defense #1 is the stingiest in the country.
The roster and the staff
TPi+#114-10.1
Recruiting#129-14.5
Returning#74-0.0
247 talent#114561.4
Head coach#63+0.0
What other systems say
Composite#138-30.8
SP+#138-29.1
SP+ off#138+10.4
SP+ def#137+39.2
ESPN FPI#138-33.2
The box-score view
Yards/G#132297.8
Yards/G allowed#84371.5
Pass yards/G#101196.9
Rush yards/G#131100.9
3rd down#12332.7%
3rd down allowed#10241.3%
Sacks/G#1271.1
Takeaways/G#1280.6
Ranks are national out of 138 FBS teams and #1 is best. The bar shows where a rank sits in the field; the rating is the source beneath it.
Every game, with the model's read
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Projected | Win prob | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | @ Eastern Michigan | L 17–28 | Final | |||
| 1 | vs Mississippi Valley State | W 52–0 | Final | |||
| 2 | @ Fresno State | L 3–49 | Final | |||
| 3 | vs North Dakota State | L 10–31 | Final | |||
| 4 | vs Massachusetts | L 6–35 | Final | |||
| 6 | @ Bowling Green | L 10–38 | Final | |||
| 7 | vs Ohio | L 7–48 | Final | |||
| 8 | @ Ball State | L 17–34 | Final | |||
| 9 | vs Kent State | — | ||||
| 10 | vs Toledo | — | ||||
| 11 | @ Central Michigan | — | ||||
| 13 | @ Hawai'i | — | ||||
Unlock Sacramento State’s remaining schedule
CFPi-X V4.0 Selected · data vintage 10/26/2026