Mid-American · 2026

Toledo

0–1
#93
CFPi+

View full team outlook in the War Room →

CFPi+ Index

CFPi+
-6.6#93
Offense
+18.2#124
Defense
+24.8#54
National Composite
-8.2#103
EPi+ Efficiency
+15.9#13
TPi+ Talent
-8.1#95
Head Coach
0.0#63

EPi+ Efficiency Index

EPi+
-1.5#79
Off EPi+
-1.3#80
Def EPi+
+0.2#72
Off Success
28.6%#129
Def Success
37.6%#68
Havoc Created
10.6%#114

Advanced Stats

StatOffenseRankDefenseRank
Success Rate28.6%#12937.6%#68
Explosiveness+2.3#1+1.1#43
Havoc Rate26.2%#13210.6%#114
Pass PPA+0.5#44+0.3#95
Rush PPA+0.0#85-0.2#39

TPi+ Talent Index

TPi+
-8.1#95
Recruiting
-5.7#95
Returning
+8.6#47
247 Talent
556.3#116
Head Coach
0.0#63

National Composite

C
-8.2#103
SP+
-9.4#103
SP+ Off
+17.9#118
SP+ Def
+26.9#75
ESPN FPI
-4.0#83

Traditional Stats

Yards/G
273.0#122
Yards/G Allowed
397.0#99
Pass Yards/G
196.0#94
Rush Yards/G
77.0#122
3rd Down
12.5%#131
3rd Down Allowed
33.3%#62
Sacks/G
3.0#21
Takeaways/G
0.0#99

2026 Scheduleprojected 7.02–4.98

Record
1–1
Simulated
8–4
Projected
7.0–5.0
Best case
10–2
Worst case
5–7
WKOPPONENTRESULTPROJECTEDWIN PROBMARKETEDGE
1@#71 Michigan StateL 20–30Final
2vsCentral ConnecticutW 63–10Final
3vs#80 Temple—Lose by 0.8 26–2748.3%——
4vs#55 San Diego State—Lose by 7.2 20–2734.0%——
5@#136 Ball State—Win by 13.5 28–1478.1%——
6vs#111 Buffalo—Win by 4.9 24–2061.0%——
7@#121 Eastern Michigan—Win by 5.5 27–2162.4%——
8vs#87 Western Michigan—Lose by 0.1 20–2149.9%——
10@#120 Sacramento State—Win by 4.7 27–2160.5%——
11vs#137 Massachusetts—Win by 16.7 31–1483.1%——
12vs#123 Bowling Green—Win by 7.7 24–1767.2%——
13@#118 Ohio—Win by 3.9 24–2058.8%——

CFPi+ V2026.2 · data vintage 9/8/2026